I was pleased to see that many commenters chimed in to point out that, contrary to the article's assertion, this does not appear to be a situation where a crazy, hateful, greedy aunt is suing a kid and breaking a family apart; it is more likely a case of someone trying to achieve a fair settlement with a homeowner's insurer where she was injured due to the negligence of an insured under the policy. Negligence does not mean bad intentions, and a broken wrist is not less injurious because it was caused by a hug.
Or, who knows? Maybe she is a crazy, hateful, greedy aunt who is breaking a family apart -- that's why we have jury trials.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment